Germany starts killing its elderly
In this blog I was reading, some religious person talks of a decision in Germany to begin Euthanasia. Or killing those who have wished to be killed in cases of debilitating health.
This person states: "The justice who proclaimed the ruling said it was an advancement for human rights.
Well, if human rights involve killing people then sure. But I don't think that's a human right. If someone is suffering, we have an obligation to reduce the suffering, not to kill them. "
The biggest insult I see is that, if suffering is reduced then it's all better. IF IT CAN BE REDUCED. If it can't then what? If a man/woman develops a condition where the are in severe pain all the time and the pain can not be reduced or resolved, what then are the options? The author of this post never thinks it through. In fact they never thought anything through at all. They just see, a person wants to die, and that's bad.
Well fuck you idiot. If a person doesn't want to be on a feeding tube or in a coma for potentially until death, and they want to say "Fuck it all, just kill me." You're reasoning is to keep them alive. They can't do what YOU disprove of, am I right you prick? I don't see it as human advancement where one asshole who says they are more moral then other people get to make decisions in another persons life and still claim they know whats best without even looking at the mother fucking circumstances.
If a person is in confined to a chair and unable to feed themselves, the author says, "...we recognize the value of their life despite their circumstances." They act like all life has the same fucking value. That's some good bullshit right there. What's the difference between the life of a millionaire and a gay man in Uganda. Well according to the author there is no fucking difference, it's all the same!
Ignorant pricks crying people have too many rights is just great.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment